| |
|
One
must chose between these alternatives since they
turn out to be mutually exclusive. A blend of both
is possible if you accept that neither will be maximized.
In
the real world, every laser encounter is different.
The complicating factors are:
A.
The amount of sunlight
(direct, reflected, or scattered) in the detector’s field of view.
B. The color
of the vehicle in which the detector
is installed.
C. The distance
from the laser gun.
D. The road
geometry of the laser trap.
E. The traffic
between the laser trap and the detector.
A.
Sunlight interferes with laser reception.
You can regard sunlight as the equivalent to background
noise while trying to listen for weak sounds. Laser
gun photons and the near-infrared components of sunlight
are indistinguishable. Detrimental sunlight can be
directly shining into the laser detector (the worst), or
reflected and scattered by the world at large. V1 has
a specially tailored field of view to exclude “background
glow” from areas that are unlikely to contain laser
signals (way high, way low, or off to the side).
B.
The color of the vehicle can influence the amount of sunlight relected
from the hood into the detection optics. White, silver, and bright
or metallic colors in general are 100 times more likely than gloss
black to reflect competing light into the laser detector.
C. The pencil-thin
beam of the laser gun expands with distance.
The actual beam is only several feet wide at 500 feet, but “aiming
wobble” introduced by the human holding the bulky gun make the
detectable beam at least three times larger. Even without the
wobble, it covers most of the roadway after a mile. This means
it is actually much easier to find a fragment of the beam at greater
distances from the laser trap. At short ranges, the beam may be
so concentrated that a detector mounted away from the aim point
on the vehicle may not be able to pick up enough stray energy
to activate an alarm.

D. Curves
and hills decrease chances of warning.
The laser detector needs a fragment of the direct laser beam, or at
least a low angle reflection or glint of it. The beam is a straight
line. If, for example, the laser is measuring cars in a curve,
the beam cuts across the curve, touching it only briefly. If the
curve is even moderately tight, all laser energy that misses the
target will soon be off the roadway and therefore out of play
for the detector in any other car. While that setup may sound
ideal as an enforcers’ strategy, it also increases the probability
of phony readings because of swiping error.

E. Traffic
ahead may block (bad), or reflect (good),
the laser energy from a distant laser trap. The chances of blockage
are considerably greater than a lucky reflection. Light traffic
is an advantage because there are other motorists ahead serving
as bait for the laser. A shot at them is a chance for your detector
to warn you. Heavy traffic, especially if dominated by trucks,
is bad because there can be nearly 100% line-of-sight blockage
until it’s your turn to be the target.

Now that we have The Facts,
let’s put them into a DEFENSE SYSTEM.
 |
If
one's objective is never to miss a laser encounter,
I recommend mounting the laser detector as close
to the typical laser aiming points as possible.
Here in the US, most laser operators aim at
the front license plate since it is usually
made with a special reflective treatment to
aid night-time visibility (works great for
laser visibility too, day or night). If there's
no front plate (some states don't require
one), then a headlamp cluster or piece of
bright grillwork is the next most promising
aiming point.
Advanced
warnings (a warning in time to do some good)
are more likely if one can avoid some problems
caused by the low mounting position. Advance
warnings require the greatest possibility
of receiving a weak fragment of the beam while
it is being used on traffic a good distance
ahead. To maximize reception of weak
signals, one must reduce
blockage and interference.
|
 |
Mounting
high on the windshield will position
the detector to "see" through the
windows of most vehicles ahead. Glass in vehicles
ahead is a good thing for your detector to see;
it can scatter reflections in your direction.
Sometimes it develops a glow, or a bloom, when
the beam strikes, giving yet another chance
for advanced warning. |
|
| |
Mounting
high on the windshield reduces
the effect of sunlight reflected from the
hood, which increases the detector's ability
to find weak beam fragments. Daytime warning
sensitivity is completely dominated by how
one manages the sunlight issues.


Mounting high behind the tint band
may reduce the laser signal somewhat, but
it reduces the sunlight contamination by the
same amount. The result is an unchanged laser-to-sunlight
ratio from the scene beyond your vehicle,
but with reduced hood reflections owing to
a higher vantage point—a net gain. Only in
the dead of night would a just-below-the-tint-band
mounting position be beneficial.
The
downside of high mounting is the
move away from the most common aiming points.
This means that in bright sunlight, you may
miss the occasional direct hit from very close
range—no detection at all! But that's possible
with a low mounting as well, just not as often.
Now
you know the variables, so you can make your
own choice. To me, a warning too late is the
same as no warning.

|
|